News Items & Releases
17.02.14
Canadian Defence Foundation partners with America's The Flag & General Officers' Network Read more
13.10.12
Book Release: DOOMSDAY: Iran - The Clock is Ticking by James G. Zumwalt Read more
25.09.12
Book Release: Practicing Military Anthropology by Robert A. Rubinstein, Kerry Fosher, Clementine Fujimura Read more
15.08.12
Mobile Computing: Recognizing that the Biggest Challenges We Face in 2012 and Beyond is Our Behavior and Use of Mobile Devices Read more
13.10.12
Book Release: DOOMSDAY: Iran - The Clock is Ticking by James G. Zumwalt Read more
25.09.12
Book Release: Practicing Military Anthropology by Robert A. Rubinstein, Kerry Fosher, Clementine Fujimura Read more
15.08.12
Mobile Computing: Recognizing that the Biggest Challenges We Face in 2012 and Beyond is Our Behavior and Use of Mobile Devices Read more
19.03.12
The Canadian Defence Foundation honours and recognizes Rear Admiral (Ret.) James J. Carey of the USA for his on-going support of Canadian efforts. Read more
02.03.12
Meet our newest Advisory Board members, persons who represent the next generation of Canadian expertise and leadership in the field. Read more
29.02.12
Cybersecurity is becoming an increasing issue in our daily lives, but far too often, we are the biggest vulnerability and are not even aware of it. Read more
04.01.12
The Canadian Defence Foundation announces formal working relationships with domestic and international players in academia, the think tank world, and in the private sector. Read more
04.10.11
There is a new generation of bacteria we are not prepared for. How incentivizing antimicrobial research and development will not only protect those on the front line, but each and every once of us. Read more
20.09.11
Members of the Canadian Defence Foundation travel with our supporters to the United Nations in New York City. Read more
Book Release
Toronto, Ontario | October 13, 2012
DOOMSDAY: Iran - The Clock is Ticking by James G. Zumwalt
*The Canadian Defence Foundation does not endorse any views of the authors of these books listed on our website. Rather, we post book releases to inform readers of issues that we feel would be of interest to our followers*
About the Doomsday Clock
Sixty-five years ago, a universally recognized means for assessing global vulnerability to self-destruction based on man’s development of weapons of mass destruction was established. As of 2007, that vulnerability assessment began to include man-made catastrophes related to climate change and emerging technologies.
Dubbed the “Doomsday Clock,” it is monitored by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists (BAS) in Washington, D.C. When these scientists determine man’s actions or inaction are allowing such vulnerabilities to significantly increase the danger to mankind, the minute hand of the clock is moved closer to midnight—with the number of ticks reflected by the seriousness of the danger. Alternatively, a movement of the hand farther away symbolizes a reduced likelihood such an event will occur.
Over these past six and a half decades, the minute hand has covered a fifteen minute spread, springing precariously close to midnight before easing back. The decision on any adjustment is made by the organization’s Board of Directors, after consultation with their Board of Sponsors—a group that includes 18 Nobel Laureates.
Adjustments to the Clock are not made annually but on an as-needed basis. When an adjustment is required—which has occurred twenty times during the Clock’s existence—normally it is made in the month of January. In 2007, the Clock was moved forward two minutes from its 2002 position, to five minutes before midnight; in 2010, it was moved backward to six minutes; and, most recently, in January 2012, an adjustment was made moving it forward again to the 2007 five-minute-before-midnight mark.
In 2012, when the Doomsday Clock’s hand moved one minute closer to midnight, it was attributed to three developments: (1) The narrowly avoided disaster at Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant triggered by the March 11, 2011 earthquake and tsunami; (2) the transition of power and control of North Korea’s nuclear weapons to another generation of the Kim dynasty; and (3) Iran’s designs on developing nuclear weapons.
It is the third development that is most worrisome as a theocracy, which has proven itself to be ruthless and brutal, in Tehran communicates to the civilized world exactly what violent intentions it has for the future—all while refusing to come clean on whether those intentions include a nuclear weapons capability.